Monday, January 17, 2011

The story of our universe part 1


Here is my take on the natural order of universe. Lets jump in.


The story actually starts with two friends called Energy and Entropy and an event called big-bang that they both attended together (or at-least came out together!) a long time ago before the universe was created. They had some great personalities, while one was indestructible the other was irreducible in that order. Initially after the big bang they had a field day. Energy kept spreading "out" creating space-time (in which we live) and entropy kept on increasing rapidly to give a sense of direction to this space-time (time moves forward). Now we know space-time itself is a kind of energy-form with entropy guiding it forward. But the happy story probably continued only for the first few nano or milli seconds after the event. They started fighting with each other soon after and lets see how. 


Though we don't really know in what form energy was before the big bang, just after the big bang it kept on attaining new forms which had various characteristics. Primarily it was radiation, as evidenced by the background radiation of the universe considered as the tell-tale sign of a big explosion (though recently theories have been put forth suggesting a certain kind of concentric patterns in the radiation suggesting not one but multiple big-bangs!! go here for more excitement). 


Ok, now lets get back to our story. Initially it seemed like it was the natural tendency of energy to spread out rapidly with no bounds, the form which entropy liked. But for some bizarre reason, from within radiation came a kind of "condensed minimum energy system" called "matter". And it really did matter (no pun intended). Yes, yes E=Mc2. Energy kept on condensing in to a zillion kinds of particles like quarks/strings, electrons, neutron, neutrinos etc, and no entropy did not really like it. It said to energy with a cunning intent "so you are going to fight with me, huh - but guess what I will always win, no matter how much you condense and decrease randomness I'm going to go to other places and compensate by increasing randomness". And so with those words came in to existence the 3rd law of thermodynamics.  But really it was not the fault of energy for it was already in the form of radiation which brought the electric and magnetic forces in to the picture. 

Now enter electro-magnetism(EM) the all pervading medium range force. For energy in radiation form, electric and magnetic forces are its dad and mom (Yeah..I know it rhymed!). For it is their interlinked nature that creates radiation. Yes, yes lenz's law. One common feature of these forces is that they could attract and also repel. So as said before this radiation somehow turned in to intermediate matter-energy particles fancily called either strings or quarks depending on how much you like Mr. Hawking. In these particles EM left its signature characteristic of either attracting or repelling other particles. Now no two like particles can stay together (they repel) and no two opposite particles (that attract each other) can stay together either for they will annihilate to release energy. 


So now a lot of different combinations of properties of EM created a whole range of negatively charged, positively charged and also neutral particles. There is another mysterious characteristic of these particles that I want to tell about but I will come to that later. After trying and trying to interact with each other these particles with the help of another set of friendly forces called the nuclear strong force and weak interaction force finally started forming large stable structures like electrons, protons, neutrons etc. (It was revealed later that these strong and weak forces were nothing but a different type of EM forces to the disbelief of many onlookers!. And to add to that they had this special property of acting only at very very small distances and while the hard force could only attract and the weak force could only repel any kind of particles to keep them from annihilating..how ingenious!!). So now EM has mastered both the medium ranges and short ranges. And by the way EM was called medium range force because over long ranges positive and negative forces tended to even out as they form stable clusters of matter. From now its a much familiar story of how these new particles went on to form atoms, molecules, clusters of matter, planets, stars, galaxies and but wait..... what!!?? We know that EM is medium range but how did it form such large structures at such large distances? Are we missing any part of its quest for dominance of long ranges??


Hmm! Here comes the mysterious characteristic that I was alluding to before.  My theory (for the purpose of keeping EM the lead man) is that EM "knowing" its limitation of not being able to dominate across large distances did something fundamentally to alter the particles it created. Here is where the soty gets a bit or a lot crazy (if it was not already). It created a separate form of force which could only attract, knowing its earlier limitation of "even-ing out" if allowed to both attract and repel. This new child in time has come to be know as the legen..wait for it..dary Gravity. But to be sure that gravity does not dominate the entire ranges , EM made gravity very weak in medium and short ranges compared to itself. Though we owe much of our existence to EM because as humans we are merely a large cluster of particles held together single handedly by EM forces, yet with out gravity there would have been no stable environments for life to emerge. More on this later. 


If you thought that this story took million and billions of years to play out...then... yes yes you are right that you are wrong.  This story happened with in the "first second" (again no pun intended) of the big-bang. 


Lets stop here for part 1 and continue the story of gravity and life as we know it in part 2.


But before you go I want to point out that there are some important questions unanswered in this story of our eternal warrior called energy. 
1. What exactly was energy doing before big-bang?? Probably condensed in to a dense point like singularity? What ever!
2. How did energy "expand" through "nothingness" and creating space-time? Chicken-egg paradox??
3. If there are boundaries to this energy then is it possible to go out of this space-time reality?
4. Why did energy like to form stable minimum energy systems or condensed systems called matter??
5. For all its greatness and being the ancestor of all energy forms, what exactly is radiation? Fluctuation of EM forces in space-time? What? And how did it go through nothingness to create space-time?Or does it need space-time to propagate?
6. Why was there a big noise about particle and wave natures of radiation itself?? Where did the particle nature come in from?


No one knows! Yet. See you in part 2



    A bold attempt!

    The Notion Ink Adam is the first attempt and a bold one at that by an Indian gadget designer to release a device in the international markets. I was actually surprised that there were so many people with skill sets ranging from hardware design, integration, Linux Kernel optimization, UI design and last but not least experience working with Android in India to actually produce a world class tablet.

    They had the guts and foresight to conceptualize and propose a tablet design targeted at US and European markets even before the iPad rumors started. May be that is the reason why the design of Adam is fresh, ergonomic and no where like the candybar design of the iPad. Its actually sad to see that all the tablet designs unveiled at the CES 2011 are wannabe iPads and if you have seen one you have seen them all. They all have an iPadish look with a 10" screen with a black bezel, capacitive touch and super glossy screens. They all would come out with Android Honeycomb and a Tegra 2 processor. Most importantly they would only be available to the public some where in Q2 or Q3 of 2011 and my hunch is that most of them would be priced around $600 - $1000 while the Adam has already had a round of very successful pre-order and getting ready for a second one with the lower end version of the device starting at $375.

    The positives for Adam which are numerous are its optional Pixel Qi screen which enables the device to switch to a e-reader mode and increase battery life, full GPS, full HDMI out, multitasking, 3.2MP swivel camera, WiFi+3G options, 2 USB and 1 mini USB ports with support for keyboard, mouse and external hard drives, expandable memory, Bluetooth, FM and so on.

    Additionally the design of the device has a cylindrical edge on one side housing the battery and two speakers allowing stereo sound. This thick edge comes with a rubber grip allowing you to hold the device comfortably  just like you hold a book. The swivel camera allows you to either automatically or manually change direction to capture videos and pictures. This saves cost by making redundant the extra front facing camera that all the other devices have and increase ergonomics by allowing you to point at any place by holding the device steadily. The official promo of the device even indicates a Kinect type of motion detection to play games but the feature has not yet been officially demoed.

    Now coming to the negatives, I'm going to be detailed and critical so the team can understand what I'm trying to say and may be incorporate some suggestions if possible. Firstly since the device does not ship with Honeycomb initially (even though its CEO has promised an upgrade as soon as Google releases the code which could be anywhere from 2 or 3 months down the line),  as a work around the team has built its own UI called Eden and I have my concerns with this interface. I think the Eden is productive but not necessarily attractive to the eye nor simplistic to use. The UI accepts single taps, double taps, press and holds, swipes, pinch to zooms to navigate through the UI as shown in the videos of Notion Ink which might confuse the user initially. The team should ensure that there is consistency in tapping behavior across applications. A bad example is the browser where the tabs are shown only after a tap at one edge of the screen instead of showing the tabbed interface like a normal browser would. In effect they require user to do additional gestures just to save some screen space and also limit the number of tabs opened in the process.   Overall the UI looks unfinished and unpolished but for the first release it could be accepted given the cost factor.

    Secondly, since the device is loaded with Android Froyo and its not a phone, it does not have access to the Google Market. But again this would not be an issue given an update to Honeycomb would be released. The team has gone ahead and launched its own App store called the Genesis. It has partnered with a lot of application developers to write apps for gaming, document management, GPS navigation, eReaders etc.  and it also comes out of the box with a lot of apps.I hope all those apps are fully functional and well tested. It remains to be seen how successful this new app store would be given there are already a number of stores on the internet for Android.

    Thirdly, regarding the multitasking environment called "leafs" or panels where one can view 3 application running side by side at a time, though there are uses for a side-by-side app view, no strong use cases have been demoed. The requirement of three panels per screen leads to snapping and stretching actions during the scrolling and it doesn't look good. Click on any panel and it gives an option to go full screen. So there is an additional requirement of the app having a panel view and a full view thought this might tie in smoothly with the Honeycomb interface and could become a feature in all Android tablets. Another problem is that apps developed for phones or smaller screens will not run in "leaf/panel" mode as intended because they do not support it. Eden should have by default designed to run applications in leaf mode. Though I like the concept of launcher bar which is more like the windows task bar with "hide" option selected.  I expect the launcher bar to be enabled in full screen app mode also to enable quick switching between apps instead of coming back to leaf mode.

    Fourthly, the confusion about the support for T-Mobile 3G frequency bands highlights the mistakes in choosing the hardware components. Though not a deal breaker the device does not support an upgrade to 4G which most of the other Android devices are launching with. Given the tablet is a truly mobile device and has the potential to consume data bandwidth like a desktop, supporting 4G will be critical in the future.

    Still the positives for this device hugely outweigh the negatives and it further moves in favor of the device simply because the negatives can be corrected with a new software update of course except for the problem with T-mobile 3G bands. The team has accomplished no mean task with just 50 designers and in limited time frame. If it can iron out the UI issues and integrate Honeycomb it is going to be a huge success.

    All in all the Notion Ink Adam is a device to beat and can be promoted not just as a content consuming device but also a content creation device.

    The notion called "I"

    There have been innumerable attempts through out history in the fields of theology, philosophy, science etc to explain what is "I/Me". While theologians and mystics attributed a transcendental nature to this "I" by calling it the "Soul" and even making it equivalent to their "God", and philosophers complicated it and confused us further by breaking it into Id, Ego and super ego, scientists for the most part kept mum. Deep down they had this strong feeling that the very nature of functioning of the brain gives rise to an area in the brain where disparate sensual inputs are stitched together which helps us make sense of the reality around us.

    I believe the last view is the closest to reality. The notion "I" is the name given to our consciousness. Consciousness can be described as the interaction or mashing up of all your Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic and Somatosensory inputs and each of their respective short term context and long term experiences/memories formed after they have been processed through your neocortex (part of the brain where most of the learning  activity happens contrasting with the "old brain" which we have received from primates and is responsible for basic emotions like love, fear, desire etc) . This neocortex is the differentiating aspect of humans that enabled them to develop languages, form complex societies and do creative stuff.  Neuroscience findings suggest that the organ where this mish-mashing of your life happens is the Hippocampus. If this organ is damaged a person goes in to a vegetative state or otherwise known as coma. In other words the person loses his "I". For a more interesting read on the brain and especially the neocortex I would suggest you pickup the book "On Intelligence" by Jeff Hawkins (founder of Palm Computers).

    I will try to take you through a thought experiment where you will be able to appreciate this view and may be realize that there is nothing special about the notion called "I".

    For a moment get in to a third person mode and look at your own life. (the ability to do this is an amazing feature of our brain that further confuses us in to believing that there is and different "I" inside our body). A child is born with no conscience (people have no memory of their life for the first 1-1.5 years of life). The memories and experiences it accumulates over this period of time develop in to some kind of a unique singular perspective of the world around it. The kind of upbringing and genetics play an important role as to how and what that child views in the world around it. After some time it gains full conscience i.e. develop a nearly full construct representing the world around it inside its brain and develops a world view of its own and starts referring to this unique perspective of itself as I/Me. There is nothing real about that feeling called "I" prior to its birth or during the initial phase of development. 

    Now imagine there is a way to make this experience sharable. If there is a way that all the people on this planet could suddenly start sharing their experiences right from birth. Then there really would no longer be a notion called "I" in anyone's brain, there would only be "We" which is the collective perspective of the world around all the people. See how flexible this notion "I" can be, after all its just a representation of things around us.

    Update: I recently came across an article which says the following:
    1. There is a recent discovery that says each hemisphere of the brain has its own memory storage
    2. There have been experiments with patients who have undergone surgery where the two hemispheres of the brain are separated — and each hemisphere appears to be its own, separate self
    3. This led Nicolla Webber to an interesting thought experiment whereby a person with their hemispheres severed could actually be convinced that they were two separate people


    This thought experiment goes the other way and divides the consciousness rather than integrate everyone's consciousness in to single experience like I suggested. 

    The most important thing here is that you realize that the brain forms a construct of the world around you and the happenings in it with the filter called "I". This construct of the universe around you is only available for You to experience. There is no way for you to have two lives or two experiences at the same time, it is singular and situated in your brain. This tricks you in to believing in the existence of a transcendental and independent entity called "I".

    This is not a reductionist view of what I am. This realization about "I" does not take away my humanity in anyway. I still enjoy the freshness of cold breeze in the morning, the taste of chocolate in my mouth, the satisfaction of writing this blog etc.  This realization only allows me to truly fathom the bizarreness of the universe and our existence in it. We no longer need to waste our time and resources in superstitions and resorting to religion and god men to allay our fears of the (nonexistent) "afterlife". This realization will truly lead to the advancement of the human race.

    Saturday, January 8, 2011

    Some thought experiments on human society

    Human society. A complex system of relationships defined by status, power, wealth, sharing, kinship etc. People for long have always fantasized about an utopian society where everyone is happy and is at peace with each other. So I started to wonder what really is the ideal/natural state of any system? Should there be an equilibrium? If there is one..should the system be moving towards an equilibrium?

    For example lets take a simplistic view of a society represented by a colony of ants. Ants obviously have a simpler thought process. Follow the acid stench and get food to the ant hill. It seems as though the system is at equilibrium. Every ant looks like it is equal and has the same position in its system and every ant is "happy" doing what ever it is doing. Now lets turn to a human system. Why does it seem there is no equilibrium and if there is one..then this complex system doesnt seem to be moving towards it?Why are some people rich and other poor? Why is there so much inequality and it appears to get even worse? Or is this the natural status of a society? So it looks like with increasing intelligence these interaction systems become more and more complex.

     Lets say that we bring every human on the planet to the same level in wealth and position? What would happen? Spontaneously some people would start loosing money, behave in ways to lose respect and their position and some people would start gaining more wealth, power and position. Then it leads to the conclusion that some people by nature are destined to lose money and some to gain it. So as it happens the people with power and wealth are those who always love it and do whatever it takes to achieve it. Then it is easy to understand why people even after getting rich still want more of the wealth or power that they love. This can partly explain the current political system with in the human society. Either it be small colonies, cities, states, countries or block of countries, they strive for more power and wealth. And there is always a fight between them to wrest more wealth and more power from each other. Prime example being the US and its policies of world dominance. The US is ruled by politicians and bosses of multinational corporates who love power and wealth. And I see no reason why it will stop even after they become the richest or most powerful persons in their system. I see another such power in the rise of China. If one generation of their single party system's leadership are power/wealth hungry it will propagate all future generations like its happening now and will inevitably lead to clash with the US.

    If that is so then why is there a backlash among the weaker and poor given they do not need power or happy with out wealth or power. Well I think its not so simple after all. There are a lot of forces acting in all possible directions here. And obviously there are some limits to how low or poor one can go. But I guess not matter how civilized or technologically developed humans become this seeming disequilibrium is going to stay. But meanwhile some boundaries could be vanishing. I think some trends to watch out for in this seeming disequilibrium are :
    1 Fall in nationalism/patriotism and rise in one earth one human race sentiment.
    2 Fall in religious beliefs and movement towards humanism
    3 Fall in racial prejudice and increase in inter racial mingling
    4 Fall in communication gaps, increase in usage of single language like English

    Though don't pin your hopes on any of these happening in your life time.
    But I believe that Love and Tolerance as proposed by many are definitely not the answer to a peaceful development of the human race, Love is impulsive and addictive (when it is not between genetically related entities) while tolerance is not a positive word and implies that it can not last for long.
    I believe the answer is Mutual Respect and an unquestionable acceptance of the fact that every person is entitled to his own beliefs and values (of course only until they are not harmful to others).